Most AI chat tools, from ChatGPT to Perplexity, give fast answers — but not trustworthy ones. Researchers, students, and clinicians often find themselves sifting through unsupported summaries or AI hallucinations. What’s missing is scientific grounding — and that’s where Consensus AI steps in.
Consensus AI is a semantic search and summarization engine that delivers evidence-backed answers based solely on peer-reviewed academic research. Unlike ChatGPT, it doesn’t guess — it shows what the science actually says, with citations from verified papers.
As explained in their official overview, it’s “Google Scholar meets ChatGPT — minus the noise.”
Instead of vague summaries, Consensus AI gives you:
The tool’s core mission is to eliminate speculation and replace it with verified academic consensus.
Consensus combines:
They index millions of peer-reviewed papers and synthesize answers based on real science, not blogs or news articles.
Here’s what a search looks like:
Consensus now includes a GPT-powered conversational layer (see: ChatGPT plugin) that allows you to ask multi-part questions, refine your prompts, and receive structured, evidence-backed responses — complete with citations and hyperlinks.
Currently, Consensus supports academic literature in:
Coverage is expanding, but as OutrightCRM points out, humanities and law are still underrepresented.
Consensus pulls from:
It explicitly avoids blogs, media articles, or forums, which is why it’s trusted by academics and institutions.
For Graduate Students
Accelerate literature reviews and thesis preparation.
For Researchers
Validate hypotheses with updated evidence.
For Journalists
Get quotes and evidence from real studies, not tweets.
For Healthcare Pros
Summarize medical treatments, interventions, and outcome studies.
For Policy Analysts
Support evidence-led decisions with real data.
One of Consensus’s strongest innovations is the claim agreement meter. If 80% of papers agree on a claim, it’s flagged as high-consensus. If studies conflict, the tool shows both sides transparently — something ChatGPT and Elicit don’t do.
Not quite. It accelerates literature reviews, especially for early scoping and filtering. Final decisions, critical analysis, and citation formatting still require human effort. But for many, it's become their first stop in the research process.
As per the pricing page:
Students and faculty with .edu or .ac emails can access discounts of up to 40%. Many universities have listed it in their AI toolkits, including University of Northampton.
Feature | Consensus AI | ChatGPT | Elicit |
Peer-reviewed sources only | Yes | No | Yes |
Citation transparency | Yes | No | Yes |
Claim ranking | Yes | No | No |
Study Q&A (“Ask Paper”) | Yes | No | No |
Chat with science context | Yes | Partial | No |
From Otio.ai and internal sources:
Consensus stores no user data beyond sessions and complies with GDPR. Unlike ChatGPT, every result is traceable to a real source. No ads, no hallucinations — just transparency by design.
Consensus isn't just an app — it's an AI research assistant aiming to democratize evidence-based thinking. As more tools generate content, it anchors insights in the real world.
Yes, if:
No, if:
Q: Can it write full research papers?
No—it summarizes existing work but won’t write your thesis.
Q: Is it free?
Yes, the Free plan includes 10 summaries per month.
Q: Can I use it for legal research?
Not yet—legal and humanities support is limited.
Q: Does it have a mobile app?
Not currently—browser-based only.
Ukraine
Svetlakz
Jul 24, 2025Novyny